What is the difference between AEO and GEO?

AEO (Answer Engine Optimization) is specifically about getting cited as a source when AI engines answer questions. GEO (Generative Engine Optimization) is broader — optimizing for inclusion in any AI-generated output, including product recommendations, comparisons, lists, and summaries. AEO is a subset of GEO.

Do I still need traditional SEO?

Yes. AEO doesn't replace SEO — it complements it. Traditional Google search still drives the majority of organic traffic for most B2B and ecommerce businesses. AI Overviews appear on roughly 47% of searches, but they often pull from the top SEO results. Strong SEO foundations make AEO 5-10x more effective.

How do you actually track AI citations?

We run a defined prompt set (30-100 queries depending on package) across ChatGPT, Perplexity, Claude, Gemini, and Google AI Overviews on a weekly cadence. We log whether your brand is mentioned, where you appear in the response, what context, and which competitors are cited alongside or above you.

How long until I see results?

Faster than traditional SEO, slower than paid ads. Schema and structural fixes get reflected by AI engines within 2-4 weeks. Citation increases on existing pages: 4-8 weeks. New AEO content getting indexed and cited: 8-16 weeks. Compounding effects: 4-6 months.

What is the pricing for AEO services?

Three packages. Starter at $2,500/month for SMBs. Growth at $5,500/month for $5M-$25M brands. Enterprise from $12,500/month for $25M+ brands. Quarter-to-quarter contracts with no 12-month lock-ins. INR pricing available for India clients.

Will AI eventually replace traditional search?

For some use cases, yes. For others, no. Research-heavy queries increasingly happen in AI tools. Transactional queries still happen in Google. The right strategy is to optimize for both surfaces — your content engine produces material that ranks in SERPs AND gets cited by AI.

Gamma vs Canva for Presentations (2026): Which Is Faster?

Disclosure: some links are partner links — we may earn a commission at no cost to you. Opinions are our own from client work.

Gamma and Canva both make presentations, but from opposite directions. Gamma generates a full deck from a prompt or outline in seconds. Canva gives you templates and full manual design control. We use Gamma for speed on proposals; here’s the honest comparison.

The short answer

Gamma when you want a presentable deck fast from an outline — proposals, internal updates, first drafts. Canva when you want pixel-level design control and a huge template/asset library.

Try Gamma →

Where Gamma wins

Generates a full deck from a prompt in seconds
Restyle the whole deck instantly
Great for speed and first drafts
Doubles as simple docs and web pages

Where Canva wins

Full manual design control
Massive template and asset library
Broader use beyond decks (social, print, video)

Head-to-head

Factor	Gamma	Canva
Best for	Fast AI decks	Full design control
Speed	Seconds from a prompt	Manual build
Design control	Guided	Total
Beyond slides	Docs, sites	Social, print, video

Want us to set this up for you? Free 24-hour consult.

Talk to us →

Verdict

Need a solid deck in ten minutes? Gamma. Need a designer’s control and a huge asset library? Canva. See our Gamma review and the AI tools we use for client work.

Not sure which is right for you?

Tell us your website and what you're trying to fix. We'll recommend the right tool for Gamma vs Canva: which builds better presentations faster? — and send a prioritized action list. No pitch, 48-hour turnaround.