What is the difference between AEO and GEO?

AEO (Answer Engine Optimization) is specifically about getting cited as a source when AI engines answer questions. GEO (Generative Engine Optimization) is broader — optimizing for inclusion in any AI-generated output, including product recommendations, comparisons, lists, and summaries. AEO is a subset of GEO.

Do I still need traditional SEO?

Yes. AEO doesn't replace SEO — it complements it. Traditional Google search still drives the majority of organic traffic for most B2B and ecommerce businesses. AI Overviews appear on roughly 47% of searches, but they often pull from the top SEO results. Strong SEO foundations make AEO 5-10x more effective.

How do you actually track AI citations?

We run a defined prompt set (30-100 queries depending on package) across ChatGPT, Perplexity, Claude, Gemini, and Google AI Overviews on a weekly cadence. We log whether your brand is mentioned, where you appear in the response, what context, and which competitors are cited alongside or above you.

How long until I see results?

Faster than traditional SEO, slower than paid ads. Schema and structural fixes get reflected by AI engines within 2-4 weeks. Citation increases on existing pages: 4-8 weeks. New AEO content getting indexed and cited: 8-16 weeks. Compounding effects: 4-6 months.

What is the pricing for AEO services?

Three packages. Starter at $2,500/month for SMBs. Growth at $5,500/month for $5M-$25M brands. Enterprise from $12,500/month for $25M+ brands. Quarter-to-quarter contracts with no 12-month lock-ins. INR pricing available for India clients.

Will AI eventually replace traditional search?

For some use cases, yes. For others, no. Research-heavy queries increasingly happen in AI tools. Transactional queries still happen in Google. The right strategy is to optimize for both surfaces — your content engine produces material that ranks in SERPs AND gets cited by AI.

Deel vs Remote (2026): Best EOR for Global Hiring?

Disclosure: some links are partner links — we may earn a commission at no cost to you. Opinions are our own from client work.

As remote teams go global, Deel and Remote are the two platforms most companies compare for Employer of Record (EOR) and contractor payments. Both let you hire abroad without setting up local entities; they differ in coverage, pricing and product breadth.

The short answer

Deel for the widest country coverage, fast contractor onboarding and an expanding all-in-one HR/payroll suite. Remote for an owned-entity model that appeals to teams prioritizing deep compliance control in core markets.

Try Deel →

Where Deel wins

150+ country coverage for contractors and EOR
Fast onboarding and a huge integration ecosystem
Broad platform: payroll, EOR, contractors, equipment, immigration

Where Remote wins

Owns more of its local entities in core markets
Transparent, flat EOR pricing
Strong IP and compliance positioning

Head-to-head

Factor	Deel	Remote
Best for	Widest coverage, all-in-one	Owned-entity compliance depth
Country coverage	150+	Fewer, deeper
Contractors	Excellent	Good
Pricing	Competitive, tiered	Flat, transparent

Want us to set this up for you? Free 24-hour consult.

Talk to us →

Verdict

For most companies scaling globally fast, Deel’s coverage and breadth win. Remote suits teams that want maximum owned-entity compliance in a few core markets. Full breakdown: our Deel review.

Not sure which is right for you?

Tell us your website and what you're trying to fix. We'll recommend the right tool for Deel vs Remote: which global hiring platform wins? — and send a prioritized action list. No pitch, 48-hour turnaround.